.NDE2.ODE - Revision history

67.205.165.153 at 19:32, 20 February 2018

2018-02-20T19:32:33Z

67.205.165.153 at 18:41, 20 February 2018

2018-02-20T18:41:25Z

67.205.165.153: Created page with "Animal Psychology The endowments of animals have, in all ages of the world, excited discussion; but this discussion has neither inaugurated a science, nor offered any expositi..."

2018-02-20T18:40:00Z

Created page with "Animal Psychology The endowments of animals have, in all ages of the world, excited discussion; but this discussion has neither inaugurated a science, nor offered any expositi..."

New page

Animal Psychology
The endowments of animals have, in all ages of the world, excited discussion; but
this discussion has neither inaugurated a science, nor offered any exposition of the
intellectual life of animals the lower orders of animals, in the least degree satisfactory.
There are difficulties however; one of which, and a very serious one, is the want of a
sufficient knowledge of their habits; another may be found in the abysmal nature of all
intellectual science; but a greater than either arises from that stupendous blunder {as well
as} and subtile fraud upon the animal races, the {introduction} mention of the term
“instinct.” We have here a system of philosophy in a deffinition; {we have} an
installation of the supernatural in the place of the rational, which silences at once all
inquiry into the facts. If it be true that the acts of animals are the result of an inward
persuasion, or a spontaneous impulse beyond their control; or the {deed} work {act} of
an agent which performs ignorantly and blindly a work of intelligence and knowledge
then the term instinct {(disposes of the whole subject)} (will answer all the ends it was
designed to subserve); but on the contrary if these acts are the direct result of perception,
reflection and volition, then the deffinition is absurd, and the question subject is open like
any other to inquiry into the facts.
It would seem to require no argument to prove, that all animals are endowed with
a principle which performs the same office in governing their conduct, {that} which the
human mind does in regulating {the} man’s conduct of man {yet instinctists must deny
this}. But we shall only /venture to/ [lightly crossed out] assume that man is endowed
with a {certain} principle, which is distinct from the body, to which all of his acts are
referable as a cause or motive power, except such as are {strictly} involuntary. We shall
also assume that all animals below man are endowed with a certain principle, which is
distinct from the body, to which their acts are referable as a cause or motive power,
except such as are strictly involuntary.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Animal Psychology
 The endowments of animals have, in all ages of the world, <br /> excited discussion; but
-this discussion has neither inaugurated a science, nor offered any exposition of the
+this discussion has neither inaugurated a <br /> science, nor offered any exposition of the
 intellectual life of animals the lower orders of animals, in the least degree satisfactory.
 There are difficulties however; one of which, and a very serious one, is the want of a